Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
minus(0) → 0
+(x, 0) → x
+(0, y) → y
+(minus(1), 1) → 0
minus(minus(x)) → x
+(x, minus(y)) → minus(+(minus(x), y))
+(x, +(y, z)) → +(+(x, y), z)
+(minus(+(x, 1)), 1) → minus(x)
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
minus(0) → 0
+(x, 0) → x
+(0, y) → y
+(minus(1), 1) → 0
minus(minus(x)) → x
+(x, minus(y)) → minus(+(minus(x), y))
+(x, +(y, z)) → +(+(x, y), z)
+(minus(+(x, 1)), 1) → minus(x)
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:
+2 > minus1
+2 > 0
Status: +2: [2,1]